榕城古街拆迁户再告福州房管局Site RongCheng GuJie again against the fuzhou housingadministration bureau

榕城古街拆迁户再告福州房管局,依据合不合法?
2006-09-30 来源:海峡都市报 郑建彬
[提要] 状告福州市房管局的榕城古街20拆迁户,今年年初获得了终审胜诉,拆迁许可证和拆迁公告被撤销(本报去年12月10日,今年2月7日、4月11日等曾做多次报道)。市房管局在败诉后,于今年5月12日,再次贴出新状告福州市房管局的榕城古街20拆迁户,今年年初获得了终审胜诉,拆迁许可证和拆迁公告被撤销(本报去年12月10日,今年2月7日、4月11日等曾做多次报道)。市房管局在败诉后,于今年5月12日,再次贴出新的拆迁公告。拆迁户们再次将房管局告上法庭,要求撤销拆迁许可证和拆迁公告,理由是拆迁公告重复下发、多份文件不合法等。昨日,台江法院开庭审理此案,但未作当庭判决。

据了解,房管局新的公告决定,从5月12日至11月30日为止,对福州市五一南路和瀛洲路交叉口东南角(俗称“榕城古街”)房杂地共8.26亩实施拆迁,建设项目为“台江广场”。

在去年7月1日,福州市房管局也对该项目下发了一份拆迁公告,只是去年的公告,拆迁安置方式为货币补偿和一次性异地产权调换。而新的公告,拆迁安置方式变成了货币补偿和产权调换两种。
——————————————————————————–
庭审焦点是否重复下发公告?
在昨日的庭审中,拆迁户指出,1998年11月6日,市房管局在“榕城古街”地块曾贴出了房屋拆迁许可证及拆迁公告。拆迁户将其告上法庭,2000年3月7日,福州中院终审判决,判令拆迁户败诉,维持市房管局贴出的房屋拆迁许可证及公告。“这份许可证和公告根本没有撤销”,如今市房管局又贴出了一份拆迁许可证和拆迁公告,“根据《行政许可法》的规定,应当依法办理注销手续,才能颁发新的许可证和公告。”而福州市房管局的代理律师认为,拆迁许可证和拆迁公告的有效期为半年,超过半年可视为无效。
拆迁户又提出,福建省计委、福建省外经贸委联合下发的关于文华广场(后更名为台江广场)商品房项目的批复第四条就明确规定,按照《土地法》和省政府1993年第9号令的规定,“项目自批准之日起两年内按规划要求建成,逾期将按有关规定处理。”“如果算起时间,台江广场远远超过两年”,根据相关法规,两年内没建成,该由政府收回土地。

对此,该案的第三人福州市文华房地产有限公司(拆迁人)称,准备开发这一土地后,由于种种原因,一直无法拆迁,市政府的《会议纪要》说这块土地可以延期使用。

而拆迁户认为,《会议纪要》不是法律,不具有法律效力。
——————————————————————————–
有人伪造合同?

庭审中,第三人文华公司提供了异地安置房的购房合同。拆迁户认为,“该公司提供给法院及原告的购房合同是伪造的,要追究该公司作伪证的行为。”

拆迁户说,购房合同复印件有多处毛病,包括一些手写签名的位置等,几乎都相同,“这是根本不可能的,很可能是用一份购房合同,复印出10份购房合同,只是把其中的一些楼层等进行更改。”

第三人文华公司当庭提供了原件,并说,合同绝对是真实的。“由于复印量太大,工作人员采用了比较简要的复印方式,可能是用一份合同,然后用白纸将手写的地方遮盖进行复印。”

福州市房管局的代理律师认为,在文华公司向房管局提供购房合同原件时,他们有核对过原件的真实性,他们不认为购房合同属于伪证。

对此,法庭要求第三人将购房合同原件留下,由合议庭审视是否存在作伪证的情况。
Site RongCheng GuJie again against the fuzhou housingadministration bureau, based on the match not lawful?

The 2006-09-30 source: the ZhengJianBin metropolis daily

[abstract] sued the RongCheng GuJie fuzhou room canal 20 site and earlier this year, won the final win the lawsuit, the license and the announcement was revoked (this last December 10, February 7, this year, on April 11, etc have reported many times). City room canal after losing in, in this year May 12, once again, new sued fuzhou of room canal posted RongCheng GuJie 20 site and earlier this year, won the final win the lawsuit, the license and the announcement was revoked (this last December 10, February 7, this year, on April 11, etc have reported many times). City room canal after losing in, in on May 12, the announcement post new again. The site again will housingadministration bureau to court, requirement cancel the license and the announcement, reason is the announcement issued by more than a repeat, not legal documents, etc. Yesterday, TaiJiang court hearing in the case, but not be ruling.

According to information, room canal new announcement, from May 12, to November 30 date, so that may of fuzhou south road and yingzhou intersection of southeast (known as “RongCheng GuJie”) room noise of 8.26 mu to implement the, the construction projects for the “TaiJiang square”.

In the last year, July 1, fuzhou room canal in the project also issued an announcement demolition, just last year’s announcement, the resettlement way for monetary compensation and one-time different ground property right exchange. And the new announcement, the resettlement way into a monetary compensation and the property right exchange two kinds.

- – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - –

Whether issued announcement repeat trial focus?

In yesterday’s trial, points out that the site, on November 6, 1998, city room canal in the “RongCheng GuJie” plot had put up the house dismantlement permit and the public announcement. The site will court, on March 7, 2000, fuzhou then a final decision, to judge the lose site, maintain the city room canal posted the house dismantlement permit and public announcement. “This license and announced no cancellation”, now the city room canal and posted a demolition permit and the announcement, “according to the provisions of the administrative license law, it shall cancel its formalities, can not issue new permits and public announcement.” And the lawyer thought of fuzhou room canal, the license and the announcement will be valid for half a year, more than half a year can be regarded as invalid.

Site and puts forward, fujian province, fujian province development planning commission jointly issued by the economic and trade commission on mandarin square (later renamed TaiJiang square) of article 4 of the reply to the commodity house project is to make clear a regulation, according to “say” and the provincial government in 1993 9 th order regulation, “project from the date of approval according to the requirements of the plan for two years built, overdue will press concerned regulation processing.” “If the count, far more than TaiJiang square time two years”, according to relevant regulations, two years without completed, the government in the land.

To this, the case of the third person fuzhou mandarin real estate Co., LTD (the) says, ready to develop the land, for a variety of reasons, has been unable to tear open change, the city government of the meeting, notes that the land may be extended use.

And that site, the meeting minutes “isn’t a legal, do not have legal effectiveness.

- – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - –

Some fake contract?

In the trial, the third person mandarin company provides different ground settlement houses the contract that buy a house. That site, “the company provides the court and the plaintiff the contract that buy a house is fake, shall be investigated for the company perjury behavior.”

Site said, copies of the contract at fault, including some handwritten signature position, almost all the same, “this is not possible, probably with a copy of the contract that buy a house, a contract that buy a house, just 10 to some of these changes such as floor.”

The third person mandarin company provide the original court, and said, the contract is absolutely true. “Because of too much work, copy researchers used more brief copy, may be to use way a contract, then use a blank sheet of paper will be handwritten copy covered place.”

Fuzhou housingadministration bureau attorney, think, in mandarin company to provide the original contract that buy a house room canal, they have a check up the authenticity of the original, they did not think that the contract that buy a house belong to bear false witness.

To this, the court requires the third person will leave the original contract that buy a house, the collegial panel examine whether there are giving false testimony.

此条目发表在 福建拆迁事件 分类目录,贴了 , , 标签。将固定链接加入收藏夹。

发表评论

电子邮件地址不会被公开。 必填项已用*标注

您可以使用这些HTML标签和属性: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

  • 福州晋安区横屿村安铺新村西侧的省疾控中心(省防疫站)动物饲养场地块如何处理?Fuzhou JinAnOu cross island village shop, particularly the west province by the centers for disease control (province the epidemic prevention station) animal farm plot how to deal with?
  • 安置房源未定不得先订补偿安置方案-福建拆迁新政Homes for is not book of compensation and resettlement for the demolition plan-fujian New Deal
  • 墙外鱼塘施工震裂民居-竹屿村村委会称将协调此事Outside the wall construction crack houses-fish ponds shock bamboo village committee says will coordinate on this matter
  • 竹屿村一违建户自行拆除违法建筑-认真贯彻2号精神 营造清违高压态势Bamboo lantau village one door of illegal rooftop structures to remove the illegal building-conscientiously implement the no. 2 spirit create clear violations high pressure situation
  • 保障房、商品房都是文字游戏罢了,别当真Security room, commodity house is word game stopped, don’t take it seriously
  • Rim WSOD – Display of Death
  • 福建福州晋安区横屿组团二期拆迁记录(2012年11月)
  • 关于福州市与晋安区领导与拆迁办和登云佳园回迁户等联合对登云佳园安置房和地下车库进行抽检的报告About fuzhou and JinAnOu leadership and the YunJia park move back up to do and the combination of the door, etc YunJia up the houses and the underground garage sampling inspection report
  • 福州岳峰村的村资租赁问题Fuzhou YueFeng village village endowment leases
  • How-to Employ Writing As Abuse
  • 福建表哥出炉-名表鉴赏福建交通厅长李德金到省运管局调研Fujian a cousin – watch appreciation fujian traffic director LiDeJin to provincial bureau of pipe research
  • 福州市住房保障和房产管理局关于公布晋安新城鹤林片区横屿组团项目集体土地征收房屋补偿方案的告知书Fuzhou housing safeguard and real estate administration announced new comments about the island group crane Lin area project land expropriation compensation scheme collective house told that book
  • 福州市将征收晋安区两地块,总面积约18公顷(有竹屿村)Fuzhou will collect JinAnOu two plot, the total area is about 18 hectares (with bamboo island village)
  • College Hardship Distributions having a Sample Hardship Letter
  • 国土部:规范建设用地增减挂钩试点 严禁强拆强建Homeland department: standard construction land link JiangCa strong it is strictly prohibited to increase or decrease the pilot to build